Vibecoding has earned legitimate criticism from the engineering community. X is riddled with all sorts of anecdotes about cricial but obvious security vulnerabilities like publicly accessible databases, unprotected API gateways, client-side payment processing, etc. These issues stem from a fundamental gap: AI tools making architectural and security decisions without sufficient engineering oversight.
However, dismissing vibecoding entirely overlooks its core insight. Non-technical builders achieved remarkable development velocity by focusing on outcomes rather than implementation details. They avoided analysis paralysis around technology choices because they lacked preconceived notions about "correct" approaches. This outcome-focused methodology, combined with AI assistance, enables rapid application development at unprecedented scales.
The fundamental issue isn't the speed of AI-assisted development or the tools themselves. It's the absence of professional engineering guardrails.
Vibe engineering addresses this gap by combining the velocity of AI-assisted development with professional engineering expertise. Rather than allowing AI tools to make arbitrary architectural, technology and security decisions, experienced engineers establish constraints and guardrails that guide AI assistance toward acceptable production-ready solutions. This approach maintains vibecoding-esque development speed while prioritizing sound, production-ready code.
Vibe engineering centers on establishing concrete technical boundaries upfront, then leveraging AI tools within those constraints. Standard engineering practices remain in place: source control with GitHub, branch policies, code reviews, test coverage requirements, linting standards, design and security requirements, etc. Engineering teams maintain their rigid standards and use them to direct AI coding agents toward solutions.
Several vibecoding platforms already implement this approach systematically. Lovable exemplifies this strategy by making core architectural decisions before developers write their first prompt. Applications built on Lovable follow predetermined patterns: Vite frontends, Supabase backends, Clerk for authentication, Stripe for payments, etc. These constraints represent opinionated defaults derived from production experience rather than arbitrary choices made by LLMs.
This approach essentially provides institutional knowledge as a service. For developers without established technical opinions, predefined architectural patterns remove significant barriers to building production applications. For experienced engineers, the same principle applies: encoding institutional knowledge and professional standards into constraints that guide AI tool behavior.
Effective vibe engineering requires intentional application of engineering expertise. Rather than micromanaging individual lines of code, vibe engineers focus on high-level architectural and design decisions: security boundaries, scalability requirements, performance constraints, failure mode handling, etc. Once these guardrails are established via docs/prompts, AI tools can handle implementation details within defined parameters.
Our experience at Firstloop confirms this approach's effectiveness. Clear architectural patterns, security requirements, and coding standards produce significantly better AI-generated results. Ambiguous requirements or undefined constraints lead to the same issues that characterize problematic vibecoding implementations.
The distinction between vibecoding and vibe engineering lies not in the tools employed, but in the expertise applied to guide those tools. Vibecoding optimizes for development speed and user experience while sacrificing professional standards. Vibe engineering maintains development velocity while preserving engineering rigor through deliberate constraint definition and expert oversight.
This approach acknowledges the ongoing limitations of AI tools including hallucinations, edge case gaps, and the continued need for careful code review. However, combining AI assistance with genuine engineering expertise enables production-quality software development at unprecedented speeds.
The evolution of software development likely involves neither complete reliance on manual coding nor unconstrained AI decision-making. Instead, the future centers on the strategic application of AI tools to amplify engineering expertise rather than replace it. Vibe engineering represents this balanced approach: leveraging AI velocity while maintaining the professional standards that ensure reliable, secure, and scalable software systems.
Get insights on AI development and behind-the-scenes updates from our team.